× back
Next Topic → ← Previous Topic

Interviews and Group Discussion

INTERVIEW

The main purpose of an interview is to gather answers to problems related to the research topic. It is a method used to collect information. In an interview, the interviewer or researcher interacts with the interviewee to gather the required details. This process can be structured, where specific questions are asked, or unstructured, which is more casual and flexible. Sometimes, the interview may feel like a normal conversation. Regardless of the type, the data collected is focused on the research topic, and after the interview, the researcher writes down the necessary information in the questionnaire or interview schedule.

Types of Interviews

Informal Conversational Type Interviews

  • Informal Conversational Interviews are relaxed and casual. It means the interview isn’t strict or formal.
    First, the interviewer and the respondent (the person being interviewed) start with a friendly conversation to get comfortable with each other. Once they are at ease, the researcher explains the purpose of the study. Then, the respondent is told why the research is being conducted, how important their answers are, and what is expected of them.
    Overall, this approach is friendly and makes it easier for people to share their thoughts openly.
  • हां, तो Informal Conversational Interviews में होता क्या है कि यह एकदम relaxed और normal conversation होती है। इसका मतलब यह है कि interview कोई strict या formal तरीके से नहीं लिया जाता।
    पहले interviewer और respondent (जिसका interview हो रहा है) के बीच एक अच्छी, casual बात-चीत शुरू होती है, जिसमें वो एक दूसरे को समझने की कोशिश करते हैं। जब दोनों थोड़ा comfortable हो जाते हैं, तब researcher अपना research का purpose बताता है। फिर respondent को समझाया जाता है कि यह research क्यों हो रही है, उनके answers कितने important हैं, और क्या-क्या expectation है उनसे।
    Overall, यह एक friendly और comfortable approach होती है जिसमें लोग अपने thoughts easily share कर लेते हैं।

General Interview Guide

  • In a General Interview Guide, efforts are made to ensure that no important points are missed. The way questions should be asked and their sequence are planned in advance. This guide helps in conducting the interview so that all respondents provide information on all the required topics. It gives proper direction to the conversational approach while still allowing both the interviewer and the respondent enough freedom to interact.
  • General Interview Guide में यह ensure किया जाता है कि कोई भी important point छूट न जाए। Questions कैसे पूछने हैं और उनका sequence कैसा होना चाहिए, यह पहले ही plan किया जाता है।
    यह guide interview को इस तरह से conduct करने में मदद करती है कि सभी respondents से हर जरूरी चीज़ के बारे में information मिल जाए। यह conversational approach को एक proper direction देता है, लेकिन साथ ही interviewer और respondent दोनों को थोड़ा freedom भी मिलता है बात करने का।

Standardised, Open Ended Interview

  • In a Standardised, Open-Ended Interview, the respondent gets a chance to express their ideas and opinions in detail. It’s not just about ticking options or giving short answers. The open-ended questions are asked uniformly to all respondents selected for the study. This approach not only brings out a variety of responses but also makes the research much richer and more meaningful.
  • Standardised, Open-Ended Interview में respondent को अपने ideas और opinions detail में express करने का पूरा मौका मिलता है। मतलब, यह सिर्फ options को tick mark करने जैसा नहीं होता।
    इसमें open-ended questions सभी respondents को same तरीके से पूछे जाते हैं। यह approach अलग-अलग responses लाने में मदद करती है और research को ज्यादा rich और content-full बनाती है।

Closed, Fixed-response Interview

  • In a Closed, Fixed-response Interview, answers to all the questions are provided beforehand, and the respondents have to choose the most suitable answer for them.
    All respondents select their answers from the same set of options. This format is useful when the questions have clear and straightforward answers, which can be categorized into 7 to 10 categories or fewer. Most respondents can find their answer within these categories and simply tick the relevant option.
  • Closed, Fixed-response Interview में सभी questions के लिए answers पहले से दिए होते हैं, और respondents को उन्हीं में से अपने लिए सबसे suitable answer select करना होता है।
    सभी respondents same set of options में से अपना जवाब choose करते हैं। यह format तब useful होता है जब questions के clear और straightforward answers हो सकें, और उन्हें 7 से 10 categories (या उससे कम) में divide किया जा सके। ज़्यादातर respondents को अपना answer इन categories में मिल जाता है, और वह उसको tick करते हैं।

Telephone Interview

  • A Telephone Interview is a type of interview where the researcher collects information quickly over the phone.
    The advantage is that it helps build a connection or rapport with the person on the other end of the call. However, some respondents may refuse to answer and hang up. Despite this, a personal touch can still be conveyed to the respondent.
  • Telephone Interview एक ऐसा interview होता है जिसमें researcher telephone के through rapidly information collect करता है।
    इसका फायदा यह है कि फोन के दूसरे side वाले person के साथ एक तरह का rapport (connection) बन जाता है। लेकिन, कई बार respondents answer देने से मना कर देते हैं और फोन रख देते हैं। फिर भी, यह एक personal touch provide करता है जो respondent को feel होता है।

Validity of Interview

Studies by Kahn and Cannell (1961), Maccoby and Maccoby (1954) can be mentioned in this connection. There have been found inaccuracies in respondents' versions during interviews when compared with the information obtained by other means. In the case of self-reports also similar inaccuracies have been found, particularly when the questions are asked about sexual behaviour. Kanfer and Phillips (1970) discussed the methodological problems in using self-report as an indicator of actual experience.

Do's and Don'ts in an Interview

Do's

  1. Decrease your stress. Remind yourself that the interview will be more of a conversation rather than an interrogation.
  2. Prepare some anecdotes. Be ready to talk about your interests, skills, and experiences – your career story.
  3. Arrive 10 minutes early.
  4. Check your appearance (teeth, hair, clothes) prior to the interview.
  5. Shake hands with everyone you meet during the interview.
  6. Choose to sit in a chair rather than on a couch for better interview posture.
  7. Answer questions truthfully, professionally, and directly.
  8. Ask questions throughout the interview to make it a mutual exchange of information.

Don'ts

  1. Interrupt the interviewer.
  2. Answer vague questions without clarification.
  3. Smoke, chew gum, or place anything on the interviewer's desk.
  4. Be overly familiar with the interviewer.
  5. Wear heavy perfume or cologne.
  6. Rambling long answers that could sound apologetic or unfocused.
  7. Consume alcoholic beverages or order expensive entrees if the interview comprises lunch or dinner.

Group Discussion

A Group Discussion (GD) is a structured conversation where a group of people talk about a specific topic or issue. This method is commonly used in educational institutions, workplaces, and recruitment processes to assess participants' communication, critical thinking, teamwork, and problem-solving skills.
The goal of a GD is to see how individuals express their thoughts, collaborate with others, and contribute to discussions in a group. Participants are required to present their views, respond to others' opinions, and engage in a constructive exchange of ideas, usually within a time limit. GDs are often used in selection processes to evaluate candidates' suitability for roles that require good communication and teamwork skills.

Number of Participants

The ideal number of participants in a Group Discussion typically ranges from 5 to 10 individuals. This group size allows for a balanced interaction where each participant has the opportunity to contribute, while still maintaining a focused and productive conversation. Having fewer than 5 participants may lead to limited diversity of opinions, while having more than 10 can result in chaos and difficulty in managing the discussion. The number of participants is often decided based on the purpose of the GD and the nature of the topic being discussed. A smaller group might be preferred for in-depth discussions, while a larger group may be suitable for exploring a wider range of perspectives.

Ways to Organize a GD

Organizing a Group Discussion requires careful planning to ensure smooth execution and meaningful outcomes. Below are some common ways to organize a GD:

  • Topic Selection: Choose a relevant and engaging topic that is broad enough to allow for diverse viewpoints. The topic should be thought-provoking, but not too complex, so that participants can provide input easily.
  • Moderator or Facilitator: A moderator is often required to guide the discussion, ensure everyone participates, and keep the conversation on track. They may introduce the topic, clarify any doubts, and manage time efficiently.
  • Time Management: Set a time limit for the discussion, ensuring that each participant has an equal chance to speak. The moderator should also ensure the conversation stays focused and avoid deviations from the topic.
  • Clear Guidelines: Provide participants with clear instructions regarding the format, time limits, and expected behavior. Encourage respect, active listening, and constructive criticism to foster a positive atmosphere.
  • Observation or Evaluation: In a formal GD, observers or evaluators may be present to assess participants' skills, such as communication, leadership, team collaboration, and problem-solving. Their feedback helps to evaluate individual performances.

Objectives

The primary objectives of a Group Discussion (GD) are to assess the participants' ability to communicate effectively, collaborate with others, and analyze and present ideas clearly. The key objectives of organizing a GD include:

  • Assessment of Communication Skills: GD provides an opportunity to evaluate participants' verbal communication, clarity of expression, and ability to articulate their thoughts in a structured manner.
  • Teamwork and Collaboration: GDs help observe how participants work within a group, cooperate, and contribute to the discussion. The ability to listen, respect others' viewpoints, and collaborate effectively is critical.
  • Problem-Solving Ability: Through a GD, participants are often tasked with solving a problem or discussing an issue. This helps assess their critical thinking, analytical skills, and creativity in finding solutions.
  • Leadership and Initiative: GDs allow the moderator or evaluator to assess how participants take initiative, lead the discussion, and ensure others are included. Leadership is demonstrated by those who guide the conversation without dominating it.
  • Time Management: Effective participants in a GD are those who can manage time well, allowing for smooth transitions between different parts of the discussion while staying focused on the topic.

Characteristics of GD

Group Discussions (GD) have distinct characteristics that define their structure and purpose. These characteristics help participants understand what is expected during the discussion and guide evaluators in assessing the performance. The key characteristics of a GD include:

  • Interactive Nature: A GD is inherently interactive, where participants exchange ideas, opinions, and viewpoints in a collaborative environment. The discussion is dynamic and often evolves based on the contributions of all members.
  • Group-Oriented: Unlike a one-on-one conversation, a GD involves multiple participants who engage with each other. The focus is on collective problem-solving and brainstorming, where the group works as a unit rather than individuals.
  • Time-Bound: GDs typically have a set time frame for discussion, ensuring that all points are covered without unnecessary delays. This characteristic challenges participants to manage time effectively and keep the conversation on track.
  • Moderation: A GD often involves a moderator who controls the flow of the discussion, ensures fair participation, and ensures that the discussion stays on topic. The moderator may intervene if the conversation goes off-course or if some participants dominate the discussion.
  • Focus on a Topic: The discussion is centered around a specific topic or issue. While the conversation may touch on various sub-topics, the main goal is to explore the subject thoroughly from multiple perspectives.
  • Evaluation of Participants: Participants are assessed based on their communication skills, ability to argue logically, contribution to the discussion, leadership qualities, and ability to listen and respond appropriately to others.

Essential Requirements

For a Group Discussion (GD) to be effective and meaningful, certain essential requirements must be met. These requirements ensure that the discussion is organized, participants are engaged, and the overall objectives are achieved. The key essential requirements include:

  • Clear Topic or Objective: A well-defined topic or objective is crucial for a focused and productive GD. Participants should be aware of the subject beforehand, allowing them to prepare their thoughts and contribute effectively.
  • Equal Opportunity for Participation: It is essential that all participants are given equal opportunities to express their ideas and opinions. The moderator must ensure that no individual dominates the discussion and that everyone is encouraged to speak.
  • Respectful Communication: Effective communication is fundamental in a GD. Participants should listen actively, respect differing viewpoints, and engage in polite and constructive exchanges. Disrespect or interruptions can hinder the flow of the discussion.
  • Time Management: A GD should be conducted within a set time limit to ensure efficiency. Participants must be conscious of time, making sure to express their points concisely while allowing others to contribute as well.
  • Moderation: A skilled moderator is essential to guide the discussion, keep the group on track, and ensure that the conversation remains relevant. The moderator also manages any conflicts or disruptions that may arise during the discussion.
  • Knowledge of the Topic: Participants should have a basic understanding of the topic to engage in meaningful discussions. It is important that they come prepared with relevant facts, examples, and viewpoints to contribute to the topic.
  • Open Mindset: Participants should approach the GD with an open mind, willing to listen to and consider the ideas of others. Flexibility and adaptability are key to fostering collaboration and learning during the discussion.

Process of Group Discussion

The process of a Group Discussion (GD) follows a structured sequence that ensures the discussion is organized and productive. Each stage in the process serves a specific purpose, contributing to the overall outcome. The typical steps in the process of a GD are as follows:

  1. Introduction: The discussion begins with the moderator introducing the topic or objective. This sets the context for the discussion and ensures that all participants are aware of what is expected from them. The introduction may also include rules and time limits.
  2. Initial Responses: The participants take turns providing their initial responses or opinions on the topic. This is typically done in an organized manner, with each person having the opportunity to speak without interruptions. The goal at this stage is to allow each participant to present their viewpoint.
  3. Discussion: After the initial responses, the discussion begins. Participants share their ideas, challenge each other's viewpoints, and elaborate on their perspectives. This phase is characterized by active engagement and debate. The moderator may steer the conversation to ensure it remains relevant to the topic.
  4. Clarifications: During the discussion, participants may seek clarifications on points raised by others. This is an important step to ensure mutual understanding and avoid misunderstandings. Participants may ask for more detailed explanations or examples.
  5. Summarization: As the discussion nears its conclusion, the moderator may summarize the key points and ideas that have been discussed. This helps to consolidate the information and ensures that the group has covered all important aspects of the topic.
  6. Conclusion: The GD concludes with a final round of thoughts, where participants may briefly restate their position or provide a closing remark. The moderator may also provide a concluding statement, highlighting the main takeaways from the discussion.
  7. Feedback: After the conclusion, the moderator may offer feedback on the performance of the participants, including strengths and areas for improvement. This feedback is essential for helping participants enhance their skills for future discussions.

By following this structured process, a Group Discussion becomes a dynamic and efficient method for exploring ideas, solving problems, and assessing the skills of the participants.

Example of GD

Here is an example of a Group Discussion (GD) scenario, where participants discuss the topic "The Impact of Technology on Education":

Moderator: "Good morning, everyone. Today's topic for discussion is 'The Impact of Technology on Education.' You all have 2 minutes to provide your initial thoughts. After that, we will open the floor for further discussion. Please keep your points brief and relevant to the topic."

Participant 1: "Technology has greatly revolutionized education by providing access to vast amounts of information online. Students can now access learning resources from anywhere, anytime, which enhances flexibility in learning. Online courses, educational apps, and e-books are some of the major advantages of technology in education."

Participant 2: "I agree, but we must also consider the digital divide. Not all students have access to the necessary technology or internet connection. This can create inequality in the education system, especially in rural areas where students may not have the same opportunities to benefit from technology."

Participant 3: "While the digital divide is a concern, I think technology can also be used to bridge this gap. For example, mobile learning solutions can be more affordable and accessible to students in remote areas. Moreover, teachers can use technology to create interactive and engaging learning experiences, which are proven to improve student retention and performance."

Participant 4: "However, overreliance on technology can reduce face-to-face interactions between students and teachers, which are essential for building interpersonal skills and emotional intelligence. Education should be a blend of both traditional and modern approaches, where technology enhances but does not replace human interaction."

Moderator: "Thank you for your valuable inputs. To summarize, while technology has made education more accessible and flexible, there are concerns about digital inequality and the loss of personal connections. The key takeaway is that technology should complement traditional education methods, not replace them."

Moderator's Final Thought: "It is clear that technology plays a significant role in shaping the future of education, but its implementation must be done carefully, with consideration for both its advantages and limitations. Let's work towards a balanced approach to ensure that all students benefit equally."